Skip to content
25 June 2026

Why Are More People Choosing to Disconnect From the News?

In an era of constant information, many are finding solace in stepping away from the news. Discover the reasons behind this trend and its effects on mental well-being.

Why Are More People Choosing to Disconnect From the News?

In an age where information is constantly at our fingertips, a surprising trend is emerging: more people are choosing to disconnect from the news. This isn’t about apathy; it’s about preserving mental health in an environment that often feels designed to keep us anxious and overwhelmed.

From breaking news alerts to viral social media posts, the digital landscape is saturated with content that can leave us feeling emotionally drained. But why is this happening, and what does it mean for our relationship with information?

The Digital Deluge: Why News Consumption Feels Overwhelming

The constant stream of negative content—violent videos, public confrontations, and outrage-inducing stories—creates an atmosphere of tension and negativity. Individually, these pieces may seem insignificant, but collectively, they contribute to a sense of emotional exhaustion.

Many people describe reaching a point where they either feel overwhelmed by the suffering they witness online or become increasingly numb to it. Neither outcome is particularly healthy, and researchers are beginning to understand why.

The Science Behind News Fatigue

Psychologist Ali Jasemi of Wilfrid Laurier University argues that information fatigue is not a sign of laziness or indifference. Instead, it’s a predictable consequence of placing the human brain in an environment unlike anything it evolved to navigate.

For hundreds of thousands of years, survival depended on paying close attention to threats. As a result, human brains evolved a strong bias toward negative information, a tendency psychologists refer to as negativity bias.

The Attention Economy: How Media Exploits Human Psychology

Modern media companies understand this bias extremely well. News organizations, social media platforms, and content creators all compete for one thing: attention. And negative content consistently wins that competition.

A widely discussed study published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour analyzed more than 100,000 news headlines and found a striking pattern. Each additional negative word in a headline increased click-through rates by approximately 2.3%. Positive language, on the other hand, generally reduced engagement.

This creates a powerful incentive structure where content is increasingly optimized to provoke strong emotional reactions. The more outrage, fear, anger, or anxiety a story generates, the more likely it is to be shared, commented on, and monetized.

Doomscrolling: When Consumption Becomes Compulsion

Most people have experienced it at least once: you open your phone intending to spend a few minutes checking updates, only to find yourself scrolling through a seemingly endless stream of bad news thirty minutes later. This behavior has become known as doomscrolling.

Unlike traditional news consumption, doomscrolling often feels less like a conscious choice and more like a compulsion. The brain continually seeks new information, hoping to resolve uncertainty or anxiety. Instead, each new piece of negative content reinforces those feelings, creating a cycle that’s difficult to break.

The Physical Impact of Information Overload

The consequences of excessive news consumption aren’t limited to mental fatigue. Research has found strong connections between problematic media consumption and physical symptoms.

People classified as heavy or problematic news consumers frequently report increased stress, sleep disruption, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, emotional exhaustion, and physical discomfort. These effects become particularly severe when news consumption is driven by compulsion rather than genuine interest.

In other words, constantly monitoring the news does not necessarily make people feel more informed. Often, it makes them feel worse.

The Case for Intentional Information Consumption

One of the most common experiences reported by people who reduce their media intake is surprisingly simple: important news still reaches them. Major events rarely remain hidden.

Rather than consuming everything, many are increasingly selective about which sources they trust, how often they check the news, which platforms they use, and how much emotional energy they invest. This intentional approach allows them to stay informed without feeling overwhelmed.

As the digital landscape continues to evolve, so too will our relationship with information. The key is finding a balance that works for each individual, ensuring that staying informed remains empowering rather than exhausting.

Author

Sophie Donovan

Sophie Donovan, Manchester-born and classically elegant, once turned down a commission to chase a long-form piece on Salford’s textile heritage, filing instead from the mill where her grandmother worked. Advocates patient, context-rich features and brings a taste for quiet narrative detail and theatre aficionadoship.